华为MatePad Pro 11 2022平板电脑评测

华为MatePad Pro 11 2022平板电脑评测

华为MatePad Pro 11 2022平板电脑评测--一个更实惠的iPad Pro?预算冠军。 MatePad Pro 11是一款经济实惠的高端平板电脑,支持手写笔和AMOLED显示屏。有几个缺点,因为它是华为的设备。它没有谷歌服务,也不支持5G。低价是否弥补了这些妥协?Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 12/17/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

🇫🇷 🇸🇪 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇵🇱 🇷🇺 ARM Tablet

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types

即使只有最好的才是好的,你也不应该去负债。因此,对于那些想为工作或创意任务购买生产力平板电脑的读者来说,看看Apple 宇宙之外的机型可能是值得的。

华为MatePad Pro 11是目前最便宜的iPad Pro替代品之一。不幸的是,它只能从华为直接购买,而不是许多在线零售商。此外,美国的技术限制大大限制了这家中国制造商。

这一点从设备本身也很明显,因此它有某些缺点。如果你能接受诸如绕道下载应用程序的事情,那么这里就有可能获得便宜货。在这篇评论中,我们将仔细看看华为的平板电脑。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (MatePad Series)ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G 8 x 2.4 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)Graphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 650Memory8 GB Display11.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 274 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, 120 HzStorage128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB , 102 GB freeConnections1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: Audio via USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassNetworking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 5.9 x 249.2 x 160.4Battery8300 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 40 Watt chargingChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemHuawei HarmonyOSCameraPrimary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.8 (camera 1), 8 MP wide angle f/2.2 (camera 2)Secondary Camera: 16 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: 6 speakers, charger, USB cable, 24 Months Warranty, digitizer support, face unlock, fanlessWeight449 g

Price649 EuroLinksHuawei homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionPrice

89.7 %v7 (old)12 / 2022Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022SD 870, Adreno 650449 g5.9 mm11.00"2560x1600

92.5 %v7 (old)11 / 2022Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2, M2 10-Core GPU466 g5.9 mm11.00"2388x1668

90.2 %v7 (old)06 / 2022Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GSD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730507 g6.3 mm11.00"2560x1600

89.1 %v7 (old)04 / 2022Lenovo Tab P12 ProSD 870, Adreno 650565 g5.6 mm12.60"2560x1600

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

箱子 - 高级外观与iPad Pro 11相比,它的边框明显更细。 iPad Pro 11这无疑是对Apple 。虽然这可能会使一些用户因在触摸屏上意外输入而更难操作MatePad Pro,但我们并没有遇到任何此类问题。

背面覆盖着金属涂层,这给平板电脑带来了闪亮的元素,使其具有高级美感。然而,它非常容易受到指纹的影响,而且相当难以清洁。被金属包围的圆形摄像头模块以及边缘的金属框架都非常时尚。

在压力下,当试图从角落里扭转平板电脑时,它几乎没有屈服,其刚性与该模型的整体高端愿望相匹配。MatePad Pro 11的重量为449克,比Apple 的同类产品略轻,同时由于其略微紧凑的尺寸,也更容易处理。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - 华为平板电脑的一个存储配置华为MatePad只提供一种存储配置:8GB内存和128GB存储,售价650欧元。

机型名称为GOT-W29,配备了 高通骁龙870.在国际上,型号为GOT-AL09,配备的是 骁龙888也可使用。然而,差异不仅限于CPU性能,因为最大充电速度和某些相机功能也有偏差。

当涉及到USB端口时,华为平板电脑的最大传输速度被限制在5Gb/s,而 iPad Pro 11则达到了40Gb/s。没有集成的NFC模块。

顶部:电源按钮,扬声器

底部。扬声器、麦克风、USB-C接口

对。没有连接

左边:麦克风,音量摇杆

软件--HarmonyOS有其怪异之处尽管华为的HarmonyOS 3是自己的操作系统,但它仍然很容易让人想起Android ,甚至支持安装Android 。

不管怎么说,它在几个方面偏离了EMUI,EMUI是基于Android 的开源部分,仍然被许多华为智能手机所使用,比如健康应用,它不允许直接进行活动追踪,以及Android 应用的兼容性,总体上趋于略差。

未来对专业应用程序的原生支持也是值得怀疑的。这为专业用户创造了一个额外的不确定性领域。

安全补丁可以追溯到2022年7月,使它们变得过时。为了保持与iPadOS和Android 平板电脑的竞争力,制造商将不得不加大投入。

拥有其他华为设备的用户可以从某些功能中受益,如自动检测附近的MateBook或MatePad Pro设备。这允许在没有有线连接的情况下通过共享文件夹共享文件,并通过协作模式将图像、文本和文件从一个设备传输到另一个设备。

通信和GNSS - 无服务尽管 骁龙870是一款5G SoC,但由于贸易限制,华为无论如何也不能使用最快的移动网络标准,因此在MatePad Pro 11上完全省略了蜂窝网络连接。

支持Wi-Fi 6,与同类平板电脑相比,我们的测试模型达到了体面和相当稳定的传输速度。当与我们的华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000参考路由器配对时,高端Wi-Fi 6E平板电脑的性能仍然比MatePad高出很多。

Networking

iperf3 receive AXE11000Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

735 (687min - 788max) MBit/s Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

719 (644min - 771max) MBit/s -2%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

715 (339min - 767max) MBit/s -3% iperf3 transmit AXE11000Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

893 (775min - 941max) MBit/s Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

851 (475min - 925max) MBit/s -5%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

843 (599min - 944max) MBit/s -6% iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHzSamsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1802 (884min - 1853max) MBit/s Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe

949 (941min - 958max) MBit/s iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHzSamsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1611 (1577min - 1636max) MBit/s Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe

943 (903min - 949max) MBit/s

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø734 (687-788) Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø893 (775-941)

室外的GPS测试

可用的卫星网络当涉及到MatePad Pro 11的良好地理定位时,该平板电脑至少利用了其SoC的能力,而Wi-Fi版本的 iPad Pro 11则无法连接到卫星网络进行定位。

准确度在10米以内,即使在允许一些时间流逝的情况下,户外的精确度仍然有些低。所有主要的卫星系统都用于地理定位。然而,SBAS不被支持。

在我们的实际测试中,包括用我们的测试设备和Garmin Venu 2智能手表记录自行车骑行,以进行比较,MatePad Pro 11表现为一个相当可靠的导航设备。也就是说,它偶尔会把我们放在赛道旁边。因此,需要最大精度的用户最好选择其他产品,尽管其精度仍足以满足日常使用。

地理定位 华为MatePad Pro 11 - 概述

地理定位 华为MatePad Pro 11 -转向

地理定位 华为MatePad Pro 11 - Bridge

地理定位 Garmin Venu 2 - 概述

地理定位 Garmin Venu 2 - 转弯

地理定位 Garmin Venu 2 - Bridge照相机--在良好的照明下的体面图片用前置摄像头拍摄的照片背面有一个1300万像素的主摄像头和一个800万像素的超广角摄像头,摄像头的设置非常类似于 iPad Pro 11.然而,华为平板电脑没有配备光学图像稳定功能。

用主摄像头拍摄的照片在光照度方面有些不足,但它们一般都很清晰,细节层次丰富。

自动对焦在弱光环境下很难对焦,即使是在点选特定区域后。此外,黑暗区域的动态范围还有待改进。广角摄像头的增亮能力也有些不足,尽管照片看起来还不错,只要你不放大太远。

视频可以以高达4K和30FPS的速度记录。自动对焦和自动亮度都能快速、可靠地工作。对于一个平板电脑来说,视频质量总体上是相当不错的。

最后,前面还有一个16MP的摄像头。经过仔细检查,有一些轻微的清晰度问题。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkameraclick to load imagesHuawei MatePad Pro 11Apple iPhone 14Google Pixel 7 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesHuawei MatePad Pro 11Apple iPhone 14Google Pixel 7 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesHuawei MatePad Pro 11Apple iPhone 14Google Pixel 7 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesHuawei MatePad Pro 11Apple iPhone 14Google Pixel 7 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x

我们仔细看一下主摄像头在演播室灯光下的表现。在这种情况下,颜色显示准确,而对比度即使在理想的照明条件下也会更好。此外,在文字的边缘附近有一些模糊不清的地方。

在1勒克斯的亮度下,辨别图片的内容成了一个猜谜游戏。

4.9 ∆E8.5 ∆E3.9 ∆E9.5 ∆E4.4 ∆E8.4 ∆E10.7 ∆E14.6 ∆E4.7 ∆E9.8 ∆E9.8 ∆E11 ∆E12.5 ∆E10.8 ∆E8.1 ∆E6.4 ∆E7.9 ∆E6.1 ∆E4.7 ∆E3.1 ∆E5.3 ∆E3 ∆E3.4 ∆E7.3 ∆EColorChecker Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022: 7.45 ∆E min: 3.03 - max: 14.61 ∆E28.6 ∆E53.7 ∆E38.8 ∆E35.6 ∆E44.7 ∆E63.3 ∆E52.6 ∆E34.8 ∆E42.7 ∆E27.6 ∆E64.9 ∆E64.3 ∆E30.2 ∆E48.1 ∆E36.3 ∆E76.8 ∆E43.5 ∆E43.6 ∆E79.2 ∆E69.9 ∆E51.6 ∆E36.6 ∆E23.9 ∆E12.9 ∆EColorChecker Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022: 46.01 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 79.23 ∆E

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022

附件和保修 - 弱化充电器虽然华为在平板电脑中包含了一个充电器,但它只支持22.5瓦的充电,而不是完整的40瓦。由于华为目前没有自己提供更快的型号,想要更快的充电的用户将不得不使用第三方解决方案。

有几个有趣的定制配件可用。有一个M-Pencil,有4096个压力级别,可以把MatePad Pro变成一个绘图板。同时,智能磁力键盘既是一个盖子又是一个键盘,当与外部鼠标结合时,几乎可以让MatePad Pro 11成为笔记本电脑的替代品。

标准的12个月有限 保修在全球范围内适用,而在欧盟,这一期限延长至24个月。

输入设备和处理 - 由于120赫兹,反应非常灵敏当涉及到我们的输入时,120赫兹的显示屏非常流畅,反应灵敏。

虽然没有用于生物识别安全的指纹传感器,但该平板电脑可以通过面部识别来解锁。由于没有专门的深度信息红外传感器,该系统更容易被骗。虽然面部识别效果很好,但在解锁速度方面有些欠缺。

键盘横向模式

键盘纵向模式

显示屏 - 伟大的OLED面板子像素阵列华为MatePad Pro 11配备了AMOLED显示屏,原生分辨率为2560 x 1600像素,符合我们对这个价格类别的期望。

虽然显示屏的亮度比iPad Pro 11略低。 iPad Pro 11,平均573.6尼特仍然是一个好结果。

由于采用了OLED技术,该面板能够完全关闭单个像素,实现真正的黑色和理论上的无限对比度。这导致了生动的色彩和非常深的黑暗区域。

586cd/m²593cd/m²572cd/m²556cd/m²584cd/m²569cd/m²542cd/m²593cd/m²567cd/m²

Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 593 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 573.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.8 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %Center on Battery: 584 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.03 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.159CCT: 6744 K

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022AMOLED, 2560x1600, 11"Apple iPad Pro 11 2022IPS, 2388x1668, 11"Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GLCD, 2560x1600, 11"Lenovo Tab P12 ProAMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.6"Screen-16%-20%-70%Brightness middle584620 6%551 -6%552 -5%Brightness574611 6%536 -7%555 -3%Brightness Distribution9193 2%93 2%97 7%Black Level *0.370.6Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.031.49 -45%1.4 -36%3.43 -233%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *2.643.67 -39%5.6 -112%7.25 -175%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.82.3 -28%1.1 39%2 -11%Gamma2.159 102%2.211 100%2.15 102%2.253 98%CCT6744 96%6849 95%6621 98%6417 101%Contrast1676918* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 409 HzThe display backlight flickers at 409 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 409 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8283 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0%的亮度

25%的亮度

50%的亮度

75%的亮度

100%的亮度在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行测量

尽管华为承诺以非常高的频率进行直流调光,但我们在非常低的亮度水平下测量到了明显的PWM闪烁,频率约为409赫兹。因此,我们建议敏感的用户提前在低亮度下试用该屏幕。

该显示器的色彩准确性非常好。在绝大多数情况下,用肉眼是无法辨别颜色与参考色空间的。因此,没有令人分心的蓝色色调,该显示器适用于专业判断印刷品的颜色,以及视频片段和图片的颜色校正。

CalMAN灰度

CalMAN颜色精度

卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB

卡尔曼色彩空间 AdobeRGB

卡尔曼色彩空间 DCI P3

卡尔曼饱和度

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise↘ 0.6 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey1.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7 ms rise↘ 0.8 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms).

该显示屏很适合户外使用,尽管在非常明亮的日子里,移动到阴凉处会变得非常必要,因为显示屏是有光泽的。

即使从极端角度看,屏幕内容仍然清晰可辨。

视角

户外使用性能--足够,但仅此而已随着 高通骁龙870,MatePad Pro 11配备了高端SoC,为日常使用甚至更苛刻的任务提供足够的性能。

当然,用户不应期望性能与M2相似。 Apple M2:相反,在基准测试中的表现大约是一半,在涉及到图形时甚至更少。

根据个人使用情况,用户将不得不决定在渲染过程中偶尔出现的、长时间的加载时间以及并非总是完全流畅的体验是否可以接受。

对于那些不认为Apple 平板电脑的用户来说,MatePad Pro 11在价值上有很多可供选择的地方。

Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android Geekbench 5.5

Single-CoreApple iPad Pro 11 2022

1892 Points +101%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G

1226 Points +30%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (943 - 1046, n=16)

989 Points +5%Lenovo Tab P12 Pro

955 Points +1%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022

943 Points Average of class Tablet (103 - 2286, n=77, last 2 years)

876 Points -7% Multi-CoreApple iPad Pro 11 2022

8491 Points +153%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022

3362 Points Average of class Tablet (303 - 10522, n=77, last 2 years)

3293 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G

3269 Points -3%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (2725 - 4455, n=16)

3245 Points -3%Lenovo Tab P12 Pro

3215 Points -4%Antutu v9 - Total Score

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022

1257986 Points +86%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G

927884 Points +37%Lenovo Tab P12 Pro

707685 Points +4%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (581322 - 716502, n=13)

682849 Points +1%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022

677914 Points Average of class Tablet (126757 - 1286774, n=31, last 2 years)

517767 Points -24%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G

13740 Points +40%Lenovo Tab P12 Pro

13565 Points +38%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (9827 - 16054, n=15)

12937 Points +32%Average of class Tablet (3195 - 27428, n=86, last 2 years)

11547 Points +18%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022

9827 Points CrossMark - Overall

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022

1585 Points +117%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G

1069 Points +46%Average of class Tablet (227 - 2155, n=67, last 2 years)

910 Points +24%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (719 - 844, n=8)

762 Points +4%Lenovo Tab P12 Pro

732 Points 0%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022

732 Points BaseMark OS II

OverallSamsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G

6908 Points +14%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022

6043 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (5289 - 6369, n=13)

5926 Points -2%Lenovo Tab P12 Pro

5865 Points -3%Average of class Tablet (195 - 13159, n=68, last 2 years)

5333 Points -12% SystemSamsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G

10926 Points +6%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022

10334 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (8463 - 10489, n=13)

9469 Points -8%Lenovo Tab P12 Pro

9124 Points -12%Average of class Tablet (904 - 18343, n=68, last 2 years)

8485 Points -18% MemoryHuawei MatePad Pro 11 2022

7694 Points Lenovo Tab P12 Pro

7365 Points -4%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (5689 - 8167, n=13)

7166 Points -7%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G

6940 Points -10%Average of class Tablet (401 - 17963, n=68, last 2 years)

6237 Points -19% GraphicsSamsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G

18998 Points +53%Average of class Tablet (418 - 57192, n=68, last 2 years)

13505 Points +9%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022

12445 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (10386 - 12801, n=13)

12016 Points -3%Lenovo Tab P12 Pro

11754 Points -6% WebSamsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G

1581 Points +17%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1315 - 1791, n=13)

1517 Points +13%Lenovo Tab P12 Pro

1452 Points +8%Average of class Tablet (10 - 2370, n=68, last 2 years)

1432 Points +6%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022

1348 Points UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022

17904 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (12855 - 18000, n=8)

16424 Points -8%Average of class Tablet (2597 - 74821, n=68, last 2 years)

13148 Points -27%Legend

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Average of class Tablet

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe

5328 Points +338%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

2205 Points +81%Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1225 Points +1%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1216 Points 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe

5137 Points +318%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

2287 Points +86%Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1232 Points 0%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

1230 Points 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe

21302 Points +402%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

9052 Points +113%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

4244 Points Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

4199 Points -1%3DMark / Wild Life Score

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

8630 Points +103%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

4243 Points Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

4211 Points -1%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

120 fps +1%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe

120 fps +1%Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

119 fps 0%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

119 fps GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe

697.9 fps +203%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

381 fps +66%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

230 fps Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

226 fps -2%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe

120 fps +58%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

115 fps +51%Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

78 fps +3%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

76 fps GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe

449.5 fps +241%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

209 fps +58%Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

132 fps 0%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

132 fps GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe

118.3 fps +123%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

88 fps +66%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

53 fps Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

49 fps -8%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe

277 fps +195%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

146 fps +55%Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

95 fps +1%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

94 fps GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe

94.5 fps +195%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

47 fps +47%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

32 fps Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

30 fps -6%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe

171.4 fps +196%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

83 fps +43%Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

58 fps 0%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

58 fps GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe

97.3 fps +363%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

34 fps +62%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

21 fps Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

20 fps -5%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe

77 fps +250%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

35 fps +59%Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

22 fps 0%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

22 fps GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe

111 fps +236%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

50 fps +52%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

33 fps Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

32 fps -3%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe

278.6 fps +380%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GAdreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

87 fps +50%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

58 fps Lenovo Tab P12 ProAdreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

57 fps -2%

在所有的浏览器基准测试中,这款平板电脑都比其竞争对手慢得多。华为的浏览器和 骁龙870华为的浏览器和骁龙870都不是网页浏览速度最快的处理器,这可能是造成这一结果的原因之一。

在实践中,网页可能需要一些时间来加载,在滚动时,图片的显示会有一点延迟。

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 (Safari 16)

220.382 Points +245%Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 393, n=73, last 2 years)

135 Points +111%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)

121.695 Points +90%Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)

108.3 Points +69%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (60.7 - 108.3, n=12)

87.7 Points +37%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)

63.9 Points WebXPRT 4 - Overall

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 (Safari 16)

223 Points +210%Average of class Tablet (26 - 315, n=76, last 2 years)

123.3 Points +71%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (46 - 107, n=4)

79.8 Points +11%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)

72 Points WebXPRT 3 - Overall

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 (Safari 16)

342 Points +264%Average of class Tablet (39 - 435, n=33, last 2 years)

184.7 Points +96%Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)

155 Points +65%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)

155 Points +65%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (94 - 155, n=13)

127.5 Points +36%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)

94 Points Speedometer 2.0 - Result

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 (Safari 16)

363 runs/min +577%Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 603, n=64, last 2 years)

168.3 runs/min +214%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)

116 runs/min +116%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (51.4 - 77, n=12)

67.2 runs/min +25%Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)

65.5 runs/min +22%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)

53.6 runs/min Octane V2 - Total Score

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 (Safari 16)

72484 Points +120%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)

48205 Points +46%Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)

41256 Points +25%Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=103, last 2 years)

37204 Points +13%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (20543 - 41256, n=13)

33246 Points +1%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)

33003 Points Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total

Average of class Tablet (319 - 27101, n=85, last 2 years)

2756 ms * -103%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1055 - 1792, n=13)

1401 ms * -3%Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)

1354.5 ms * Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)

1055 ms * +22%Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)

864.6 ms * +36%Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 (Safari 16)

466.8 ms * +66%* ... smaller is better

MatePad Pro 11的UFS-3.1存储相当快,达到了良好的写入和读取速度。这款平板电脑对顺序访问的处理似乎大大优于随机访问。

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5GLenovo Tab P12 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class TabletAndroBench 3-532%13%17%27% Sequential Read 256KB16151517.98 -6%1782 10%1581 ?(529 - 3134, n=65) -2%1534 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=88, last 2 years) -5% Sequential Write 256KB730.71026.82 41%758 4%742 ?(233 - 1332, n=65) 2%1126 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=88, last 2 years) 54% Random Read 4KB171.3263.23 54%232.5 36%242 ?(126.2 - 428, n=65) 41%225 ?(20.1 - 475, n=88, last 2 years) 31% Random Write 4KB187.8256.83 37%189.2 1%238 ?(61.8 - 503, n=65) 27%241 ?(9.1 - 745, n=88, last 2 years) 28%

游戏--很适合游戏大型平板电脑似乎是游戏的一个好选择。然而,与较小的屏幕尺寸相比,用户将不得不在大屏幕上将手指移得更远,这取决于游戏的情况。

在UHD设置下,性能足以满足《暗黑破坏神:不朽》或《PUBG移动》等高要求游戏。在最低40甚至最高60FPS的情况下,这两款游戏即使在高图形预设下仍可玩。

我们使用GameBench来测量帧率。

暗黑破坏神:不朽

PUBG手机版

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.3.0: Ø39.9 (38-41) Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.3.0: Ø39.9 (38-41) Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 1.7.0: Ø59.6 (54-61) Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 1.7.0: Ø59.8 (56-61)

排放--冷静和一致温度在长时间的压力下,热点温度峰值为43.8℃,是高度局部的。否则,该平板电脑几乎不会出现触感发热。

正如我们的3DMark压力测试所显示的,该平板电脑能够在长时间使用中保持其性能水平。虽然其高端竞争对手的性能iPad Pro 11在这项测试中明显下降,但在完成基准测试后,它仍然高于我们的测试模型。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.2 (25.1-25.3) Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø84.4 (77.5-118.7) Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.1 (37.3-50) Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.2 (25.1-25.3) Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.35 (7.34-7.37) Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø28.4 (26.6-34.4) Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø10.9 (10.2-13.4) Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø7.3 (7.29-7.33)

Max. LoadIdle

30.3 °C41 °C34.7 °C 30.1 °C34.3 °C32.3 °C 29.1 °C31.5 °C32.9 °C

Maximum: 41 °CAverage: 32.9 °C

31.9 °C43.8 °C32.3 °C33.7 °C35.1 °C31.9 °C32.3 °C33.8 °C30.5 °C

Maximum: 43.8 °CAverage: 33.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 39.9 °C | Room Temperature 19.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle

23.3 °C24 °C23.5 °C 23.7 °C23.9 °C23.6 °C 24 °C24.2 °C25 °C

Maximum: 25 °CAverage: 23.9 °C

23.2 °C24 °C23.4 °C23.6 °C23.4 °C23.6 °C24.7 °C23.3 °C23.7 °C

Maximum: 24.7 °CAverage: 23.7 °C Power Supply (max.) 38.9 °C | Room Temperature 20.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

热像仪正面

热像仪背面发言人华为总共使用了6个扬声器,根据我们的测量,允许这款专业平板电脑实现非常线性的中音和高音。即使是高基频也应该是可感知的。

而在实践中呢?流行音乐听起来确实非常清晰,而且--由于频谱大--丰富而迷人。虽然对于古典音乐来说,声音轮廓总体上过于单薄,但对于偶尔听一些作品来说,绝对是足够了。

虽然可以通过USB-C或蓝牙连接外部音频设备,但用户将不得不使用SBC、AAC和LDAC,因为尽管使用了高通SoC,却没有aptX支持。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 82% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)Compared to same class» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 75% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 12% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 86% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源消耗 - 多天不充电能源消耗华为MatePad Pro 11在消耗方面相当经济。即使在轻微的压力下, iPad Pro 11消耗的电量明显更多。相反,与同类设备相比,华为平板电脑在非常低和非常高的负载下有更高的消耗。

虽然MatePad Pro支持高达40瓦的充电,但包装中只包括一个22.5瓦的适配器。由于电池大,充电时间可以增加到3小时,这取决于平板电脑缺少多少电量。如果使用更快的充电器,这一数值会降至略高于2小时。

Power Consumption

Idle 1.9 / 2.2 / 3 Watt

Load

7.2 / 12.7 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Metrahit Energy

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 20228300 mAhApple iPad Pro 11 20227538 mAhSamsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G8000 mAhLenovo Tab P12 Pro10200 mAhPower Consumption-48%-14%-6%Idle Minimum *1.91.1 42%1.19 37%2.2 -16%Idle Average *2.26 -173%4.38 -99%2.6 -18%Idle Maximum *36.1 -103%4.45 -48%3.2 -7%Load Average *7.29.1 -26%7.85 -9%7.1 1%Load Maximum *12.710.2 20%6.67 47%11.5 9%* ... smaller is better

Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022: Ø9.29 (5.81-13.7)

Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.4 (12.1-12.7) Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.8 (2.68-3.12)

电池寿命华为平板电脑达到了良好的运行时间,这要归功于其相当大的8300毫安时电池容量。它的持续时间比 iPad Pro 11差异在高负荷下变得特别明显。这是有道理的,因为MatePad Pro的性能大大降低。

在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,该平板电脑实现了15:05小时的运行时间,这是一个不错的结果。在适度使用的情况下,电池可以持续多天不充电。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)

35h 03min

WiFi Websurfing

15h 05min

Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p

17h 00min

Load (maximum brightness)

5h 36min

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 20228300 mAhApple iPad Pro 11 20227538 mAhSamsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G8000 mAhLenovo Tab P12 Pro10200 mAhBattery Runtime-9%-3%-31%Reader / Idle21032198 5%2170 3%1034 -51%H.2641020941 -8%831 -19%892 -13%WiFi v1.3905846 -7%966 7%627 -31%Load336256 -24%331 -1%236 -30%

Pros+ 光滑、紧凑的外壳

+ 有许多配件可供选择

+ 准确而明亮的显示屏

+ GPS地理定位

+ 强大的扬声器

+ 电池寿命长Cons- 没有谷歌服务

- 过时的安全补丁

- 显示屏使用PWM

- 使用附带的适配器充电缓慢

- 不支持 aptX

- 面部识别不是很安全

- 只有一种存储配置

评语--价值不错,但不适合所有人在审查中。华为MatePad Pro 11。华为MatePad Pro 11的价格为650欧元,是一款专业平板电脑,比Apple iPad Pro 11至少便宜400欧元。

支持手写笔,键盘盖,以及良好的扬声器。华为平板电脑也提供了这三样东西。此外,屏幕很好,甚至可能使MatePad Pro 11成为喜欢AMOLED的用户的更好选择。此外,华为设备的运行时间更长。

在性能方面,Apple ,当然是明显的赢家,华为机型没有提供更多存储的选择。此外,虽然相机对平板电脑来说相当不错,但Apple ,在这个类别中也提供了更高质量的结果。

华为MatePad Pro 11的主要缺点不在华为的直接控制之下。无论如何,缺乏对谷歌服务的支持,以及使用HarmonyOS而不是Android ,使得这款中国平板电脑很难销售,特别是对于专业设置。一个不被支持的应用程序可能最终成为依赖某些应用程序工作的用户的障碍。

同样,在安全补丁的频率方面也有改进的余地,尤其是华为将MatePad Pro 11作为专业设备来销售。

华为MatePad Pro 11是一款适合专业人士使用的时尚平板电脑,具有良好的电池寿命和出色的屏幕。然而,某些兼容性问题可能会使许多潜在的商业客户望而却步。

作为一个雄心勃勃的消费机型,这款平板电脑仍然有很多优点,包括优质的平台和低廉的价格。即使在Android ,替代品如 三星Galaxy Tab S8 5G或 联想Tab P12 Pro往往要贵得多。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性华为MatePad Pro 11尚未广泛发售,但预计很快就会在制造商的在线商店和各种零售商,价格约为650欧元。

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022

- 12/14/2022 v7 (old)

Florian Schmitt

Chassis86 / 98 → 88%

Keyboard65 / 80 → 82%

Pointing Device96%

Connectivity40 / 70 → 58%

Weight84 / 40-88 → 92%

Battery90%

Display91%

Games Performance64 / 78 → 82%

Application Performance81 / 92 → 88%

Temperature92%

Noise100%

Audio86 / 91 → 95%

Camera58 / 85 → 69%

Average80%

90%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020contact me via: LinkedInTranslator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 602393 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:

Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

相关推荐